Star Trek V; The Final Frontier speculated a lot about God’s existence and His nature, if indeed He exists. For a Hollywood film, at least it did that intelligently.

Symbolism abounded, with a self-fulfilled Vulcan that recognized his id, his disciples that came to him after giving him their deepest fears, and a nameless planet at our galaxy’s center that housed a sort of supreme being, comprising many faces. There was even a Great Barrier that everyone thought would prevent access of the living to the nameless planet.

Wonder of wonders, all this had purely rational explanations, discovered when the explorers were in danger of death. All the CGI and drama aside, Captain Kirk and Spock shared an interesting exchange when the danger had passed:

KIRK: I thought I was going to die.

SPOCK: That was impossible.

Kirk gives Spock a quizzical look.

SPOCK: You were never alone.

The wisdom I took from that is simple; nothing can hurt me outside of God’s permissive or expressed will, because I am never alone. God is always with me, and in me, and His inexhaustible love will never abandon me.

The Difference Between 1st and 21st Century Christianity

Immortality Road

The difference between 1st and 21st Century Christianity is vast. The God worshiped is the same, of course. But it is a question of focus.

The central point of the early church teachings was to introduce to both the followers of Judaism and to the pagan masses the Savior and His Passion. Neither of the two audiences believed the story of the Savior and His death, burial, and resurrection upon first hearing.

In the early disciples’ writings preserved for us in the New Testament, we find the “apostles’ doctrine,” which is the teachings of Christ concerning His kingdom and our place in it. To the Jews they taught that Christ was the Messiah prophesied of old and that He is the Son of Yahweh of the Old Testament writings. To the Gentiles they taught that Christ is the true God and Savior of the whole world. They were powerful advocates…

View original post 1,005 more words

A Time for Dignity

Eric Metaxas featured Mel Lawrenz’s book, A Time for Dignity, which espouses a novel approach to the idea of dignity; not only does it demand respect, but humanity is incapable of negating it. Why? As God’s special creation, we possess the dignity He imparted to us at conception, and no one can steal what God has bestowed.

Of course, that does not prevent depraved human beings from trying to violate others’ human dignity; witness the Nazi’s shameful treatment of Jews in the ’30s and ’40s. All bullies are guilty of the same transgression, which is nothing more or less than trying to glorify oneself by diminishing another’s worth.

By contrast, I feel God’s commission to recognize others’ dignity by respecting everyone, regardless of how little they seem to deserve my respect. The easiest, most straightforward means of showing respect is simply to listen to them. Yes, some people try to take advantage of my respect by shining me on or lying, hoping to con me. But that is on their head. There is an advantage to having few possessions.

POP! Goes the Wineskin

“Neither is new wine put into old wineskins. If it is, the skins burst and the wine is spilled and the skins are destroyed. But new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved.” (Matthew 9:17 ESV)

A while back I read right through that passage, unable to grasp its implications. Later, I understood its literal concept but couldn’t see how it applied to me; I’m neither wine nor a wineskin. Then I read what Apostle Paul had to say, and God’s truth began to dawn on me.

Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.  (2 Corinthians 5:17 ESV)

As it turns out, I am indeed the wineskin that Jesus expounded upon, and in my old age the resemblance becomes even more obvious. But seriously, folks …

Before I applied the gospel of Christ to myself, allowing Him to give me rebirth in His Spirit, my flesh and its demands were all I knew. Of course, those fleshly demands included my religion and its rigid dogma. Even though someone always read a brief passage from the Gospels and the Epistles during the Mass, those holy words sailed high over my head, crashing and burning upon the sanctuary’s rear wall.

At some point, however, God’s Word began to hit its target, gradually changing the way I saw it. I began to ask questions that the priests couldn’t answer from God’s Word. If I had mindlessly accepted the Church’s dogma and rules and become a, “good Catholic,” I would have, in effect, sewn a patch of good behavior on the old wineskin of my heart. Jesus’ parable of the wineskins graphically portrays the painful result if I had chosen to go that way.

A transformed life doesn’t make a transformed spirit. Rather, by grace, through faith, God gives new life to your spirit, then to your heart, and finally to your way of life. That way, you needn’t worry about such things as torn wineskins and spilled wine.

Sorry Doesn’t Cut It

John the Baptist’s head on a platter

In Matthew 14:1-12, Herod, the mock-king of Israel, responded to his alluring step-daughter Salome’s demand for John the Baptist’s head on a platter with—well, God’s Word says it best:

[Mat 14:9 NKJV] And the king was sorry; nevertheless, because of the oaths and because of those who sat with him, he commanded [it] to be given to [her].

So easily we preface our deliberate disobedience with, “Sorry Lord, but …” Then we try to condone our actions with a litany of excuses. Flip Wilson showed himself an acute observer of churchy behavior with Geraldine’s, “Da devo made me do it.”

My theology may be better than Geraldine’s, but my rationalizations are just as transparent. I pray for the self-control to resist my baser nature, so when I ignore the red flags I, in effect, tell God, “You didn’t answer my prayer,” diverting my guilt to the righteous One.

What presumption! I hold myself above God’s judgment by judging Him for treating me unfairly. How can God forgive such deliberate blasphemy?

Am I alone in this sin? Do such rationalizations cross your mind when you condemn someone else for their worldly behavior? When you envy someone else for their undeserved good fortune? When you rationalize consuming worldly entertainments as your, “liberty in Christ”? When you lust after material goods, presuming upon God’s future provision to, “Buy now, pay later”?

I plead, “Guilty as charged.” I must join the sea of sinners at the Judge’s left hand, bound for perdition’s miserable pit of eternal fire. And that would be my fate, if not for my Lord’s infinite grace, expressed in 1 John 1:6-10, where He pronounces the conditional, “If”:

If we say that we have fellowship with Him, and walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth.
But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin.
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.

Warning—We must not simply read those key verses. We must study them. Meditate upon them. Live by them, so we can claim God’s unfathomable grace.

For Want of Light


On ships of war, the men below decks at night exist in a dim, red world, lest when called to their battle stations in the outer darkness they should succumb to night blindness. In the same way, we must willingly live in relative darkness, so we might fully see what God places before us in His subtle, spiritual light.

Isaiah 50:10-11 New King James Version (NKJV)

10 “Who among you fears the LORD?
Who obeys the voice of His Servant?
Who walks in darkness
And has no light?
Let him trust in the name of the LORD
And rely upon his God.
11 Look, all you who kindle a fire,
Who encircle yourselves with sparks:
Walk in the light of your fire and in the sparks you have kindled—
This you shall have from My hand:
You shall lie down in torment.

Guilty as charged! I would love to be alone in that verdict, but alas, I am anything but.

My confession is true; I have ventured forth into self-generated light, imagining it was from God. I should have heeded Isaiah’s admonition: Who walks in darkness and has no light? Let him trust in the name of the LORD and rely upon his God.

Is trusting active, or passive? It is active, as we discern and reject the world’s—and the self’s—seductions. But it is also passive, as we wait on God’s light, as opposed to trying to generate our own.

We live in a performance-oriented culture, and that drive taints the church’s works. We constantly audit our own productivity, and that of others. We encircle ourselves with sparks, walking in the light of our own fire and in the sparks we have kindled.

Let us not turn our work for our Lord into a competition, always striving to make points against “them,” while refusing to acknowledge the fruit “they” bear, lest they pull ahead of us on some celestial scoreboard.


Jesus said some hard things to His disciples, like in John 6:60-66, where many of His disciples turned away at His teaching about eating His flesh and drinking His blood. But His hard teachings didn’t end there; some are difficult even for today’s believers, such as in the very next chapter of John’s gospel.

Matthew 7:1-5 ESV
(1)  “Judge not, that you be not judged.
(2)  For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you.
(3)  Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?
(4)  Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye?
(5)  You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.

Oh yes, we’ve all heard this passage preached many times, but have we unstopped our ears to hear what our Master is really telling us? Yes, this is for you there, the one who shows little tolerance for doctrinal disagreement! If that lesser brother contradicts you, why, he’s trying to teach error, and conscience dictates that you expose him for what he is.

Have you, O know-it-all, ever entertained the possibility that you may not have all of God’s Truth? As much light as He has shown you, is it not possible that He has illuminated someone else where He has not you? Assuming that you have a complete grasp of God’s truth is presumption, regardless how exhaustively you have studied His Word. It embodies the sin of vain pride, which is the one sin that hides behind itself. Unless you repent, you will stand before the Judge perfectly upright, until you notice which side of the throne you are standing on.

And yes, it’s for you, the one who won’t dirty himself by offering friendship to a homosexual, just in case perversion is contagious. You’re a manly man, and your Internet surfing habits attest to that. Better to sate your sexual frustration with hetero-porn than to risk sullying yourself by exposure to the real perverts.

Take solace in the fact that God’s Word commands relative sexual purity, right? Wrong! Consider what Jesus said earlier in His sermon on the mount:

Matthew 5:27-28 ESV
(27)  “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’
(28)  But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

You may try to answer, “Lusting after porn isn’t the same as lusting after a real woman.” If so, you’d be wrong. Porn is like a drug, constantly desensitizing its user so ever harder porn is needed to satisfy. Also like a drug, it’s habitual, changing the way you see women in general so you are tempted to look at them more as sex-objects than as sisters in Christ.

Not so? How often do you dwell on physical characteristics below women’s faces? Yes, it’s hard not to notice, but dwelling and noticing are hardly the same.

And you, O media-engorged woman, cannot stand with condemning finger pointed at those lousy men. Does the word, “Hot,” occur to you upon glimpsing an Adonis? Do you love your sizzling soaps? Do regency romance novels disappoint if they are not explicit? Whether or not you like to admit it, that is chick-porn, even without graphic pictures. Do you dress to accentuate your more favorable features, attracting men’s attention? Don’t be a hypocritical, blaming men for objectifying you as a sex-object.

Those are just two of many possible examples where hypocrisy is rampant within the church. I picked them because they are also my personal battlegrounds.

Ever wonder why today’s church seems so impotent compared to the first-century church? Pray for insight, and look deeply within yourself to find the answer.


My previous post laid out some pretty stringent requirements for salvation that seem to leave no room for our human weakness. If that were all of God’s revelation to us, we would be in seriously bad straits. But there’s also this little thing called, “grace,” and it’s not to be taken lightly.

Searching, “did evil,” produced twenty hits in the KJV’s Old Testament. Each time, God judged that generation with some calamity that lasted until Israel begged His forgiveness and repented of their adulterous ways. And each time they repented, God gave them victory over their oppressive enemies. That’s grace.

Popular misconceptions have God either wearing a red suit and long, white beard, or throwing lightening bolts at anyone who steps out of line, but those who seriously read the Old Testament will see the depths of God’s love and grace toward His wayward people. God used all that failure, and all that judgment, simply to show us that we have no hope for salvation outside of His grace.

The fact that you’re reading this indicates your interest in things Biblical. The teaching of God’s inexhaustible grace is the hinge pin of all Bible doctrine.

Here you will find a treatment of God’s grace that, while not exhaustive, is thorough enough that you may learn something about it. Though I recommend the article, please know that I don’t agree with every point the author makes, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that I am right in my conclusions, or that he is wrong. Weigh his propositions by God’s Word. If nothing else, it will give you insight into the teachings of Calvinism.

With all this teaching about God’s grace, remember that He is not Santa, keeping a balance sheet of good and bad boys and girls. From the age of accountability, we are all on God’s “bad list,” and only by obeying the good news of His grace can we hope for eternal life with Him.

TRUE FREEDOM—John 8:31-36

John 8:31-36 EMTV

(31) Then Jesus said to those Jews who had believed Him, “If you abide in My word, truly you are My disciples.
(32) And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”
(33) They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants, and have never been in bondage to anyone. How can you say, ‘You will become free’?”
(34) Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly I say to you, that everyone that practices sin is a slave of sin.
(35) And a slave does not remain in the house forever, but a son remains forever.
(36) Therefore if the Son sets you free, you will be truly free.

We usually think of this as an evangelistic passage, yet, verse thirty-one says Jesus was addressing, “Jews who had believed Him.” Then He followed with an “if” statement, which means the promise is conditional upon abiding, or staying, in His Word.

Does this mean we must always tote a Bible around under our arm and quote Scripture at every turn? I only wish I could quote Scripture to every situation, but my lame power of recall prevents that sort of fluency with His Word. Even so, God’s Word incarnate lives in me, and I in Him. The blessing in that intimacy is the God-colored glasses that His Word provides for me. While book-chapter-verse eludes me, my general familiarity with His Word often enables a red signal flag in my mind when I’m about to go out on my own in disregard of His will, or witness flagrant violations of His principles. I think that is what Jesus meant by staying in His Word.

Verse thirty-two promises to set us free, but free from what? Jesus’ blood covers our sin in the Father’s view, freeing those of us who believe with saving faith from the eternal death we deserve. If Jesus’ blood gives us His eternal life, why worry about living in His Word?

That’s exactly the same as asking why we should live holy lives for Him, because without His Word we will never achieve that holy life. Here’s where His Word comes in again:

1 Peter 1:15-16 NKJV
(15) but as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct,
(16) because it is written, “BE HOLY, FOR I AM HOLY.” (Leviticus 11:45)

That’s a command, my friend. It’s not optional, or impossible, this side of heaven. Apostle Paul summed up God’s command for our lives:

1 Thessalonians 5:23 NKJV
(23) Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

You might insist that is optional, based on a best-case scenario. If so, read the rest of that passage for the knot that ties it all up:

He who calls you is faithful; he will surely do it. (1 Thessalonians 5:24 ESV)

Please see my followup post for the grace side of the gospel.

Danger: Quicksand!

Psalms 37:23-24 ESV
(23) The steps of a man are established by the LORD, when he delights in his way;
(24) though he fall, he shall not be cast headlong, for the LORD upholds his hand.

To which man does this passage refer? I think it’s addressed to the one who delights in the existing One’s(YHWH’s, Yahweh’s, Jehovah’s, or the LORD’s) Way, which of course is the Lord Jesus Christ (John 14:6). If one delights in Jesus, and His Way, the existing One establishes or directs the course of his life. That can be taken as an absolute statement, as one who delights in God’s Way will not easily go against that inclination. If he does, verse 24 and 1 John 1:9 apply, and he will not be cast headlong to destruction, but the existing One steadies and sustains his hand.

I visualize an explorer blazing a path through the jungle, where he encounters a wide mud bog. Being a careful explorer, he realizes the possibility that it is quicksand, and his Guide cannot show him a way around it. His Guide locates a downed log, long enough to span the bog, and just big enough to do the job. As he mounts the log he finds it precarious at best; he needs his Guide’s steadying hand. Being a klutz, he loses his balance and begins to fall into the quicksand, but his Guide pulls him back onto his narrow path.

What an encouragement, that I don’t need to worry about falling into the “quicksand!” My Guide will keep me on His path despite my human weakness, because I delight in His Way. Of course, this promise excludes anyone who insists on delighting in, and pursuing, his own way.